Final Project

The final project is something I truly enjoyed working on.  I think I finally realized what I like and don’t like in the film project.  My favorite part was being the artistic director on set.  I researched dance films and decided what type of film we would be making.  From there our team developed a story line.  I was able to make a lot of the creative decisions since I was the one most familiar with dance.  I picked the location, costumes to match the color scheme, choreographed the dance, as well as blocked the dancers around the space.  This was my favorite part of the process and I can absolutely see myself choreographing more dance films in the future.  I think this class really helped me see the cinematic side short films, and allowed me to choreograph with that in mind.

For this project Connor was the DP and the one actually handling the camera.  We all contributed shot ideas but he was the one maneuvering the camera.  In the future I would like to be the one holding the camera, just on projects of my own.  That way I can get more experience and see if that is something I can pursue for filming other short student projects.


Fiction Film

Creating a fiction film was a lot of fun for me.  I took the story line from a musical theatre solo that I performed in class and used it for the silent film.  It was interesting seeing the same story, told differently from live performance to film.

Something I really liked about our film was the lighting for the indoor scene.  I am not the best with lighting but hearing my partner think of all these ideas for lighting made me think of it in a completely different way.  Instead of just having lighting be there to set the mood and be a stagnate component, we used lights to signify the shutting of blinds and the turning on of the phone.   Something with lights that could have been better was the outdoor lighting.  The footage was very overexposed and it was hard to color correct it to look natural in post.

What was cool about this project was that we each defined our roles more clearly.  Because our different schedules some would shoot and others would edit different scenes.  I was able to be on set for the indoor scene.  I realized that the part I like best in making films is staging the actor and setting the scene of the room.  I also like to set up the camera and make sure everything is at its proper levels because I get annoyed when there is an overwhelming amount of color correcting and out of focus in a film.  I do not like doing lighting because it is not something that clicks as easily with me.  Something that is really nice about silent films is that you can direct the actress as you are shooting because there is no sound.

I edited the second half of the film.  While I enjoy editing, I do not enjoy editing when I was not there to film.  I had no control over how much footage was handed to me or if the visuals were what I would have wanted.   I do like pasting the footage together and watching the story come to life.  My favorite part to edit was when the actress was walking down the hall and runs into someone and you see them walking from both perspectives.  I also liked playing with fast and slow motion in the video because it added to the comical aspect of the film.

After filming our first fiction film it confirmed my feelings that fiction is my favorite type of film.  I loved working with an actress and being able to tell a story through the acting, lighting, cinematography, location and sound.  I am glad that we worked on fiction without dialogue first because I think adding dialogue is going to be very stressful.

Fiction Film Critique

The fiction film i watched was a physiological thriller titled “Zodiac.”  This movie was about a serial killer in California who went around killing innocent people and left clues for the police and the press along the way.  The killer called himself the Zodiac killer and taunted the police with calls and personal letters.  The investigation goes on for a few years

There were a few parts of the movie that I thought lighting really added to the believability of the film.  One of them was during a birds eye view of the streets.  The camera was following a car and you could see the headlights on the cars and the lights from passing by buildings and lit up signs.  Another was on the house boat of Paul Avery’s house.  The light was seeping through the wholes in the window shades and casting shadows and sun rays onto the actors.


A lot of the outdoor scenes happened at night and there was lighting to make it seem as if overhead light posts were shining down.  The night scenes shot inside made it actually seem like night because there was dark shadows and it seemed like the only light source was coming from a lamp.  In the office scenes there are bright florescent lights to capture the cubicle office room of the 70s.

Documentary – Leadership Fellows

Creating my first documentary was a huge learning process.   Starting from developing a story line, all the way down to the editing process was a challenge.  We initially shot the interviews not knowing how we wanted to frame the story.  So our first time around we asked a large amount of broad questions to see what information we could pull from the interviewees.  From that, we created our rough cut and that is when we found the direction we wanted to go.  Once we knew what our intention was for the video we were able to formulate questions and the interview session to our needs and capture footage that would further our main point.

We ended up using only the second interviews for our final project because they ended up being more concise answers from the subjects as well as better framing and lighting.  One of the issues we ran into during the interview process was that we used two freshman fellows.  Because they were only a few months into the program, they had fewer personal experiences and input.  They were also less natural in front of the camera, as opposed to Alexis who was much more natural and thorough in the interview.

When we reached the final editing process we had our biggest issue.  We edited the entire project and then were going go finish a few things the next day.  When we went back to edit the project was not saved to the hard drive and we lost all of our work and had to start completely over.

Documentary Critique

The documentary I watched was “The Hunting Ground,” directed by Kirby Dick. This film was an exposé on sexual assault on college campuses in the United States. It covered issues from the initial incident, how authorities handle it, and the repercussions the incident has on the victim. The film brought awareness of sexual assault through statistics, personal stories, and how advocates are trying to bring justice on repeated offenders.

The film brought in people from all aspects of sexual assaults to hear their different points of view. The majority of the dialogue was the victims sharing their story in detail about the night they were assaulted and the disappointment with administration they faced when trying to report the rape. The stories were so personal; you could feel the pain in the characters voices as they repeated them to the interviewer. The stories were told linearly and the storyline developed alongside the events of the actual assault. As more characters were introduced to the story, the documentary interviewed the situation from their point of view.

The documentary interviewed deans, professors, and presidents of universities to hear their take on that particular case and sexual assault in general on campuses. Many professors were advocates for students but discussed how universities are run like a business and try to cover up their flaws. Through the first hand experiences shared and statistics provided the audience can grasp that there is a problem, and universities are only inflicting more harm on the victim instead of helping. It made me as an audience member and college student frustrated to see these occurrences happening across the country.

As the story continued more characters were brought to the table: psychologists, police officers, lawyers and parents. The latter was the most heart wrenching to watch. Seeing how this situation affected the victim’s relationship to themselves as well as with their parents.   You could hear interviewer prompt the victim about their experience telling their parents. Some victims responded saying they still haven’t told them.

On a more legal side of the story, the documentary brought in the lawyers and police officers that played a role in sexual assault cases. They talked about the loopholes often found in rape cases and how universities have been proven to go behind a judicial court hearing and allow the rapist back onto campus. Seeing the legal system blatantly corrupted was disheartening. This showed the audience the aftermath of sexual assault from the perspective of the law. Evidence of the government and adults who are supposed to prosecute felons, instead are dismissing them.

To change the point of view again the filmmakers managed to get a rapist, who was incarcerated for 6.5 years, to talk about their perspective. This is another informative piece of information to support the rape stories, because all of his knowledge of how a rapist acts matches with all of the victim’s stories of assault. They also interviewed a fraternity brother to make the case that “sexual conquests” are something that is praised upon in fraternities.

The story had a beginning, middle, and end that was true to the way these sexual assaults played out in real life. Each part of the story had interviews from various points of views to support the main idea. The film finished with a positive outlook on the activism that is taking place across colleges to stop sexual assault on campuses. I think the film was extremely moving and should be strongly encouraged, if not mandatory, for every incoming student, and college administration to watch.

“Some Like It Hot” Film Critique


For my third film critique I watched “Some Like it Hot” directed by Billy Wilder. This film was made in 1959, but based in 1929 in America during the prohibition era. Because there was a thirty-year difference between the filming of the movie and the setting, the set design, costumes and props all head to reflect the original artifacts of the time. In the 1950s film were shot in color, but this film was shot in black and white. I read online that the movie chose to shoot in black and white because the makeup that the men had to wear gave them a green tinge in colored film. I wonder though if they were also thinking about the 1929 era and how most films were shot in black and white.


Black and white film brings a whole new approach to costume and set design. If the director wants the attention to be on one person by how they dress, they wouldn’t dress them in red because that would show up as grey onscreen. Instead white draws the attention of the audience in black and white.


“Some Like it Hot” was filmed in California, though the story did not take place there. The movie starts off in Chicago with snow and cold weather. The costuming reflected the weather and the characters were dressed in down coats that would be worn during the 20s and the allusion of snow along with the sound of strong wind, made it believable that the scene was taking place in a cold area. The rest of the movie takes place in Florida, which was actually filmed at an old-timey hotel in San Diego, CA. The director chose this location because the hotel matched the era they were shooting in and therefore less adjustments would have had to been made.


The costuming in the movie was entertaining. The girls were dressed in 20’s flapper like costumes and had the elegant furs and diamonds. There was a jazzy feel to the movie with the girl band and the use of diegetic and non-diegetic music. Costuming played an important role, since the men were dressed as females for the majority of the movie. The men had to look convincingly like women, shaved legs, stockings, dresses, wigs, makeup, and jewelry. It was humorous because the clearly still had the build of men and their voices were not natural for the voice of a woman.


The camera work in the movie was pretty basic from what I noticed. When the characters are talking the camera stays relatively still and when the characters move the camera tracks along with them. There are your pans and tilts, but compared to the kind of camera work cinema has available to them today it is nothing groundbreaking. There were a lot of two shots because the main characters were a pair. I noticed the over the shoulder shots when two characters were conversing the director wanted both bodies in the shot.


I thought the movie was enjoyable to watch. I’ve only seen a clip of the movie “White Girls” but I imagine they got some of their inspiration from this movie. I liked how in the movie, when the boys were dressed like girls they realized how much harassment girls receive from men constantly. This is an iconic movie and I would recommend it.




Experimental Film Critique

Within Reach

The initial shot is of two strangers passing by on the street and then it cuts to a close up of their heads to show the man looking intently at the female as they pass by. The close up helps the audience notice this pivotal moment right of the bat. The scene then changes to a room where the male and female live out this daydream of strangers falling in love through a dance.

Something I did not like about this video was the way they transitioned cinematically into this daydream. The girl walked out of the frame to the left and then the man walked out of the frame to the right. Immediately after they cut to the scene in the other room. They had the girl walking the same direction, however, because she walked out of the frame to the left and then was walking in the frame to the right the continuity seemed a little off to me. I know it had her walking in the same direction technically but it was accompanied by the way the man entered the new scene that threw me off even more. The man exited the last scene to the right but entered this scene in a whole new directional pattern, coming straightforward from the back of the room. If they were trying to continue from the scene on the street, they should have had the man chasing after the woman or something that matched the first scene.

The first shot of the daydream dance scene is filmed slightly above the dancers. This gives the audiences the perspective of looking over what is happening. In this moment we are not apart of the action, just observing from above. The camera switches to a straight on angle where the composition is strong. The two dancers are standing back to back in the center of the frame and there are features in the wall behind them that match their verticality.

The camera plays with a lot of different ideas in this film. It is constantly switching from medium shots to close ups to extreme close ups, high to low angles, and moving or still camera work. The extreme close ups were used effectively for parts where the director was trying to draw the attention to touch. The camera would focus on the hand touching the face to evoke feelings of intimacy. A lot of the camera work would actually move with the dancers. It made the audience feel as if they were moving with them, trying to watch the dance from a 360-degree perspective as opposed to just straight on.

As for the positioning of the dancers in the space, there were parts where the dancers would move in front of the window and the lighting would darken the image of the dancers. They should have kept their movement along the windowless wall to keep continuity in lighting.

I think they were filming in a tight space because there were moments that were medium shots, but still cut off some of the movements. These didn’t seem intentional because most of the body was in the shot, except for parts of the limbs and it cut off the lines and movements of the dancers.